FLUX 2 [pro] vs GPT Image 2 (medium)

The same balance runs both. Here is what actually differs.

FeatureFLUX 2 [pro]GPT Image 2 (medium)
VendorBlack Forest LabsOpenAI
Rate on UGESI16 credits per image14 credits per image
Clip lengthsn/an/a
Resolutionsmodel defaultmodel default
Best forEveryday photoreal image generation and iteration.Posters, menus, interfaces and any image with readable text.
Watch out forText rendering is weaker than GPT Image 2Not the most photoreal option

Which one to run

Pick FLUX 2 [pro] when you need photorealistic default. Pick GPT Image 2 (medium) when you need cleanest typography.

You do not have to decide before you start. Both models sit in the same tools and the rate is shown before each run.

Which one to pick

FLUX 2 [pro] costs 16 credits per image. GPT Image 2 (medium) costs 14. That makes GPT Image 2 (medium) the cheaper run.

Pick FLUX 2 [pro] when everyday photoreal image generation and iteration. Its limit worth knowing: text rendering is weaker than gpt image 2.

Pick GPT Image 2 (medium) when posters, menus, interfaces and any image with readable text. Its limit worth knowing: not the most photoreal option.

Both run on the same balance. You can switch between them inside one tool, and the rate is shown again before each run.